Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9811132327460.9308-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA (Michael Robinson <robinson@public.bta.net.cn>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 14 Nov 1998, Michael Robinson wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > >> GNOME then adopted ORBit, which has two wins: it's in C, and (this is > >> the biggy) it has provisions to shortcut parameter marshalling, > > > > My experience is that for pretty much every pro, there is a > >con...what are we losing with ORBit that we'd have with mico? Short > >and/or long term? mico is reputed to be Corba 2.2 compliant..orbit? > > The big con for ORBit, short term: > > % cd /usr/src/gnome/ORBit-0.3.0 > % find . -name "*.c" -exec grep "Not yet implemented" {} \; | wc > 857 2613 30302 > > That's 857 items specified in the IDL for ORBit that are currently empty > functions. > > I think long-term, with the financial backing of RedHat, and the key role > it plays in the GNOME, I think ORBit will be the premier open-source ORB. Can we do the first implemntation using MICO and convert over later, if the need arises? Or are those 857 items not important? Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: