Re: [HACKERS] Why is libcurses added to build by configure?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Why is libcurses added to build by configure? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9810302314560.28793-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why is libcurses added to build by configure? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Tom Lane wrote: > Does anyone understand why configure.in wants to include libcurses in > $(LIBS) ? There is no program in the PostgreSQL distribution that uses > that library (at least, I could not find any reference to curses.h). > > On HPUX 10, including libcurses causes problems because it defines a > select() routine that has nothing to do with the select() system call. > There is a hack in Makefile.hpux that gets around this (by linking -lc > ahead of the libraries chosen by configure), but that is going to cause > problems for supporting HPUX 10.01, because signal considerations demand > that -lBSD come first on that platform. > > I would like to pull out the configure.in code that adds -lcurses to > LIBS, but I'm hesitant to do it at this late stage in the release cycle > without knowing why it was there in the first place. Did we use to have > a frontend that used curses, or something like that? Good stuff, you are learning...do not pull anything out, period. Don't add anything in, period. There was a reason for it, but it was sooooo long ago that I don't recall what it was. It has worked up until now, and if only HPUX 10.01 is reporting a problem with it...leave it. Mark it as un-supported at this time, and work at fixing it post-release. Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: