Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9810290037250.28793-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > Actually, the darn thing is *crawling* with bugs. > > > > Guess BETA3 won't be the release, eh? *grin* > > I can see an argument for letting it go for 6.5, but if it is broken, > and is showing up in regression testing, I think we have to fix it. > > We can't fix it in 6.4.*. No initdb for that. Bruce, can you and Thomas go through Tom's patch with a fine toothed comb before its committed? this close to release (5days!), I'd rather have a tri-agreement on it, but from what David mentioned, it seems that it would be "a good thing" to get in before v6.4 is released... If all three of you feel it is a) right and b) safe, throw it in. I'll do up a quick BETA4 (release candidate 2) as soon as you tell me whether or not its being/been committed... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: