Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9810131646390.4514-100000@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? (Eric Lee Green <eric@linux-hw.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Eric Lee Green wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Jeff Hoffmann wrote: > > >I agree completely, LIMIT would be VERY usefull in web based apps, which > > >is all I run. It does not matter to me if it is not part of a formal > > >standard. The idea is so common that it is a defacto standard. > > > > i'm not familiar with mysql and using "LIMIT" but wouldn't this same effect > > be achieved by declaring a cursor and fetching however many records in the > > cursor? it's a very noticeable improvement when you only want the first 20 > > out of 500 in a 200k record database, at least. > > The problem with declaring a cursor vs. the "LIMIT" clause is that the > "LIMIT" clause, if used properly by the database engine (along with the > database engine using indexes in "ORDER BY" clauses) allows the database > engine to short-circuit the tail end of the query. That is, if you have 25 > names and the last one ends with BEAVIS, the database engine doesn't have > to go through the BUTTHEADS and KENNYs and etc. > > Theoretically a cursor is superior to the "LIMIT" clause because you're > eventually going to want the B's and K's and etc. anyhow -- but only in a > stateful enviornment. In the stateless web environment, a cursor is > useless because the connection can close at any time even when you're > using "persistent" connections (and of course when the connection closes > the cursor closes). Ookay, I'm sorry, butyou lost me here. I haven't gotten into using CURSORs/FETCHs yet, since I haven't need it...but can you give an example of what you would want to do using a LIMIT? I may be missing something, but wha is the different between using LIMIT to get X records, and definiing a cursor to FETCH X records? Practical example of *at least* the LIMIT side would be good, so that we can at least see a physical example of what LIMIT can do that CURSORs/FETCH can't... Marc G. Fournier scrappy@hub.org Systems Administrator @ hub.org scrappy@{postgresql|isc}.org ICQ#7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: