Re: Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
От | Tom Samplonius |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: PHP and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.10101022030040.8582-100000@misery.sdf.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: PHP and PostgreSQL (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, mlw wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Does this requested chagne have to do with Apache or PostgreSQL? > > > I suspect it is a request that live postgresql processes can linger > around after a connection is completed and be re-assigned to a new > connection as soon as one comes along. This will save the startup cost > of a new postgresql process. This is what apache does. I don't think is really going to provide much of an impact. Postgres has to do a lot more initialization per session than Apache. Mainly because Postgres has to deal with a stateful protocol, not a stateless one like Apache. Besides, as already has been tested, session startup time is minimal. > -- > http://www.mohawksoft.com Tom
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: