Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend]
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.02.9809212132580.385-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [sferac@bo.nettuno.it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 21 Sep 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I don't see how we can ever duplicate all the tests everyone runs with > their applications. I suppose it is possible, but as applications > change to use new features, we would still be running the old > application tests. Just a side note on this thread...nothing prevents *add* to the regression test, and, in fact, I see this all the time, especially as new features are added. If someone comes up with a test that they feel stresses an aspect of the server that we haven't thought of (so long as it doesn't include adding 80meg of data to our backend), by all means, let us know and throw patches our way that we can include. If you want to 'volume' test it, regression tests aren't for that...they are only meant to catch changes between versions or snapshots as a result of a change somewhere else in the system... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: