Re: [HACKERS] regular expressions from hell
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] regular expressions from hell |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980629222542.6863J-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] regular expressions from hell (dg@illustra.com (David Gould)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, David Gould wrote: > Article 10705 of comp.os.linux.misc: > Newsgroups: gnu.announce,gnu.utils.bug,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.sources.d > Subject: Rx 1.9 > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:40:00 -0700 (PDT) > Approved: info-gnu@gnu.org > > The latest version of Rx, 1.9, is available on the web at: > > http://users.lanminds.com/~lord > ftp://emf.net/users/lord/src/rx-1.9.tar.gz > and at ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/rx-1.9.tar.gz and mirrors of that > site (see list below). The reason that we do not use this particular Regex package is that *it* falls under the "Almighty GPL", which conflicts with our Berkeley Copyright... Now, is there is a standardized spec on this, though, what would it take to change our Regex to follow it, *without* the risk of tainting our code with GPLd code? Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: