Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980608012645.347e-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > To be honest, the only ppl that should be required to run > > regression tests are those that are developing and preparing for > > releases...for someone installing, they don't really give a warm fuzzy > > feeling due to the discrepencies that the various platforms show that we > > consider to be "normal" :( > > But INSTALL says: > > 18) If you wish to skip the regression tests then skip to step 21. > However, we think skipping the tests is a BAD idea! and we think this because? its always confused me as to why an end-user would generally have to run regression tests on "supported and tested platforms". I can understand us, as developers, doing it prior to a release, and I can understand someone doing it on an 'untested' platform...but anything on a supported/tested platform should be caught by us, the developers, before the end-users see the software... Now, if we can get the regression tests to pass 100% on all platforms, the point becomes moot, but, IMHO, all it does is causes/adds more confusion to the end user then required... :( Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: