Re: [HACKERS] An easier way to upgrade (Was: Lots 'o patches)
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] An easier way to upgrade (Was: Lots 'o patches) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980602101027.12843E-100000@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] An easier way to upgrade (Was: Lots 'o patches) (Goran Thyni <goran@bildbasen.se>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Goran Thyni wrote: > Mattias Kregert wrote: > > How about making a file specifying what to do when upgrading from one > > version of pg to another? Then a program, let's call it 'pgconv', would > > read this file and do the conversions from the old to the new format > > using pg_dump and psql and/or some other helper programs. > > I think what is needed is a replication program, since pgsql uses > socket comunication it is quiet easy to run 2 concurrent systems > say one each of 6.3.2 and 6.4 and copy beteewn them at run-time. > > The easiest way would be to use dump&load but as David pointed out in > a case where dump&load takes 20 hours it means 20 hours downtime unless > we want inconsistent data (data inserted/updated while copying). > > A smarter replication would make the downtime shorter since most data > would be upto date and only latest changes need to be transfer during > "update downtime". > > Such a mechanism would be even more useful for other proposes like > clustering/backup/redundancy etc. > > Has anyone looked as this? > The only thing I have seen is the Mariposa project which seems to be > somewhat overkill for most applications. Someone had scripts for this that they were going to submit, but I never heard further on it :(
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: