Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980525194118.1021A-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? (dg@illustra.com (David Gould)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 25 May 1998, David Gould wrote: > Ok, I think I have found the source of the dropconns on "delete" querys > that are causing the current problem. The change listed below sets > tupType to the junkFilter (whatever that is) jf_cleanTupType unconditionally. > This makes a SEGV later as the tupType ends up NULL. > > Here is what CVS says: > --------------- > revision 1.46 > date: 1998/05/21 03:53:50; author: scrappy; state: Exp; lines: +6 -4 > > From: David Hartwig <daveh@insightdist.com> > > Here is a patch to remove the requirement that ORDER/GROUP BY clause > identifiers be included in the target list. > -------------- > > I do not believe that this could ever have passed regression. Do we have > the whole patch to back out, or do we need to just "fix what we have now"? fix what we have now...if its possible... > Also, perhaps we need to be more selective about checkins? We're in an alpha/development phase here...my general opinion on that is that I'd rather someone throw in code that is 95% good, with 5% error, then nobody making a start anywhere... Until a Beta freeze, *never* expect the server to actually work...if it does, bonus. Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: