Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980324005039.324F-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration (Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih@Hamartun.Priv.NO>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23 Mar 1998, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote: > Marc's argument that version numbers have to stay where TCL/TK is > involved is very important: they are nearly always incompatible with > themselves in preceding and following versions, making it necessary > for a typical site to have one complete TCL/TK installation for each > and every application that uses the damn things. (You may recall that > I expressed amazement at my discovery that I could use 7.6/4.2 with > both Scotty and PostgreSQL.) > > Anyway, my take on the --with-tcl (and --with-perl) things, relative > to PostgreSQL 6.3: Can you take a quick look at the way things are right now and submit a new patch against the current version for the tcl stuff? I think this "multiple version" thing with tcl/tk is an inconvience, but a necessary one based on the way they do do development :( Other then this, I don't think we have any outstanding issues we wanted covered...is there? If not, if this can be submitted before 4pm today, I'll include it...if not, the patch/tar file is created and *finally* released at that point :) Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: