Re: Documentation tree (again)
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation tree (again) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980226174001.230I-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Documentation tree (again) ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote: > OK, so when I asked earlier about documentation directory structure, > Marc indicated that we should put things into a separate area, not just > plop them into the usual src/ tree. I agree, but am not sure _where_ to > actually put them. > > I am thinking of making a directory doc/src/sgml (under the existing doc > directory) which would contain the sgml source code. doc/src would > contain that and a Makefile which would know how to invoke the Makefile > in doc/src/sgml. A "make install" from doc/src would copy gzip packaged > files up to doc/, where they would be for a distribution. > > A Makefile in doc/ would unpack the gzip tar files of html into > directories right under doc/, such as doc/tutorial, doc/userguide, etc. > > Is this OK? Some questions: Sounds good to me... > 1) Should all html be isolated into subdirectories under a doc/html/ > directory? I'd say that all html should be installed in $prefix/html when a 'make install' is issued. You should be able to remove the package after installing... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: