Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh'
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980224003627.230N-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh' (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh'
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh' |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > Can I suggest pgview_ then? Another problem is that a \d on an empty > > > database, \d is going to show this view, isn't it. Kind of strange to > > > me. > > > > I modified psql already such that: > > > > relname !~ '^[pd][bg]_' > > > > is ignored :) > > I still disagree. Why not keep the system stuff pg_? This can be done, > and it keeps things consistent. The above check also finds pb_ and dg_. Actually, I'm not married to db_* for views...it was a "quick fix" to ensure that things still worked. Whatever we decide on, both Julie and Peter, at a minimum, need to know relatively soon. I know in Julie's case, she does do a call to pg_user...I let her know tonight that she needs to change it to db_user, for the *current* code... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: