Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980201182256.12562U-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote: > > > > > > > > Has anyone seen the jdbc patch I posted earlier today? > > > > > > If not, I'll ftp it. > > > > I haven't seen it...send me a copy directly? The mailing lists > > have '# of lines' limits to messages, which may have been where it got > > lost... > > Wonder what the limit is? Let me find out by trial and error... :-) I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had increased hackers, but just switched it around: # maxlength [integer] (40000) <resend,digest> # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters. maxlength = 4000000 Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: