Re: Ideal Hardware?
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ideal Hardware? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.A41.3.95.1031001180900.53904A-100000@fn2.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Ideal Hardware? (Jason Hihn <jhihn@paytimepayroll.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ideal Hardware?
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jason Hihn wrote: > We have an opportunity to purchase a new, top-notch database server. I am > wondering what kind of hardware is recommended? We're on Linux platforms and > kernels though. [...] > The configuration that is going on in my head is: > RAID 1, 200gig > 1 server, 4g ram > Linux 2.6 I vaguely remember someone (Tom?) mentioning that one of the log files probably might want to go on its own partition. Sometime in the last 2 weeks. I am not pushing dbase stuff here, but my system is about your size. About 120 GB of my disk is RAID on a promiseware card, using the kernel software RAID (apparently software RAID on Linux is faster than the promisecard does it in hardware). I have a bunch of different things using software RAID: /tmp is a RAID 0 with ext2 /home is a RAID 5 with ext3 /usr, /var, /usr/local is RAID 10 with ext3 /var/lib/postgres is on a real SCSI 10k, on ext3 with noatime So, my postgres isn't on the RAID(s). I just got finished rebuilding my RAIDs for the second time (failed disk). I ended up rebuilding things in single user mode, so I can't set tasks in parallel. I don't know if you can do this in multi-user mode and/or in parallel. I'm being paranoid. Rebuilding RAID 5 is fast, rebuilding RAID 1 is a pain in the butt! My biggest RAID 10 is about 10 GB, bundling the new partition from the new disk into the RAID 0 is fast, rebuilding the mirror (RAID 1 part) takes 10 hours! Dual athlon 1.6's and 1 GB of RAM, so I have lots of horsepower. Maybe you are going with better RAID than I have, but it seems to me that RAID 5 (with spares) is going to be better if you ever have to rebuild. Gord
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: