Re: regexp_replace

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > I'm very glad to see this. But is a nicer name possible? To perl
> > programmers at least, "substitute" should make sense.
>
> What is the matter with replace?   We already have replace:
>
> test=> \df replace
>                        List of functions
>    Schema   |  Name   | Result data type | Argument data types
> ------------+---------+------------------+---------------------
>  pg_catalog | replace | text             | text, text, text
>

I think that regexp_replace is a good name. It is easy to understand.

regards,

--- Atsushi Ogawa