Re: PostgreSQL HardWare

i'm guessing he meant what he said, 70.000, which
to american audiences reads as seventy thousand
and is written as 70,000. european countries use
a period as the thousands separator rather than a
comma like we do.

rjsjr

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of
> Troy.Campano@LibertyMutual.com
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:30 PM
> To: jwbaker@acm.org; snmartin@galilea.cl
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL HardWare
>
>
> Well did he mean 70.000 records or 70,000 records?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey W. Baker [mailto:jwbaker@acm.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: Fernando San Martín Woerner
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL HardWare
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Fernando San Martín Woerner wrote:
>
> > I need to build a postgresql database with 2 tables containing 70.000
> > records each one, but they'll increase their size in 4.000 records
> > monthly and some triggers and functions will be running on this tables
> > plus other smaller tables less than 40.000 records.
>
> That's a really small database.  You should be able to run it on
> practically
> any hardware, and probably store all the data in memory.
>
> -jwb
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>