RE: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

Hi,
Thank you for your reply. 
I missed the message, sorry.

Regards,
Noriyoshi Shinoda

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 6:28 PM
To: Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>; Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>; Stephen Frost
<sfrost@snowman.net>;Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>; Jakub Wartak <Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com>; Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>;Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>; Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>; David
Steele<david@pgmasters.net>; pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
 
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:03 PM Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com> wrote:
> Thank you for developing the great feature. I tested this feature and checked the documentation. Currently, the
documentationfor the pg_stat_prefetch_recovery view is included in the description for the pg_stat_subscription view.
 
>
> INVALID URI REMOVED
> toring-stats.html*MONITORING-PG-STAT-SUBSCRIPTION__;Iw!!NpxR!xRu7zc4Hc
> ZppB-32Fp3YfESPqJ7B4AOP_RF7QuYP-kCWidoiJ5txu9CW8sX61TfwddE$

Hi!  Thanks.  I had just committed a fix before I saw your message, because there was already another report here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKrAKeVk-LRHMdyT6x_p33eF6dCorM2jed5h_eHdRdv0reSYTA@mail.gmail.com