RE: multiple sessions to create index in parallel support
От | James Pang (chaolpan) |
---|---|
Тема | RE: multiple sessions to create index in parallel support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | PH0PR11MB5191C0CBC58B58B8F3D982E5D6B29@PH0PR11MB5191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: multiple sessions to create index in parallel support (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: multiple sessions to create index in parallel support
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
All max_workers_process got increased to 32 before creating index. The 2 session try to create index on totally separatelarge tables(40gb) , either one in 8 parallel workers, but not both. James -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 11:04 PM To: James Pang (chaolpan) <chaolpan@cisco.com> Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: multiple sessions to create index in parallel support "James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan@cisco.com> writes: > Max_parallel_workers and max_parallel_maintenance_workers both equal to 32, one session create one index in a largetable show parallel 8 workers, the other session creating one index in another separate table always in serial. Evenincrease max_parallel_worers and max_parallel_maintenance_workers to 64, still show one is parallel 8 workers, the otheris done in serial. Hmm, what about max_worker_processes ? That's an independent limit. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: