RES: RES: RES: RES: Dates rejected
От | Carlos H. Reimer |
---|---|
Тема | RES: RES: RES: RES: Dates rejected |
Дата | |
Msg-id | PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKGEMEDFAA.carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RES: RES: RES: Dates rejected (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Yes, it is the 8.0.8 version. You mean that changes to /etc/localtime should not reflect in the to_timestamp behavior? Strange, why does to_timestamp behavior changed here when the /etc/localtime was overlaped? Well, maybe the PG refresh I´ve done after changing the /etc/localtime did it (pg_ctl restart). Anyway, if it will not look at the /etc/localtime, how PG will discover the DST changes? Thank you in advance! Carlos > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Enviada em: terça-feira, 17 de outubro de 2006 00:02 > Para: carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br > Cc: Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org > Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected > > > "Carlos H. Reimer" <carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br> writes: > > To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the > /etc/localtime to relect > > the following timezone: > > Um ... what PG version are you working with? 8.0 and up don't pay > attention to /etc/localtime, because they have their own timezone info. > > regards, tom lane > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: