Re: Core dump on PG 7.1.3
От | David Esposito |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Core dump on PG 7.1.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | PEEDKNLDICKECFBNGNLLMEOOEOAA.dvesposito@newnetco.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Core dump on PG 7.1.3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Core dump on PG 7.1.3
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks ... I'll do that in the wee hours of tomorrow morning and let you know how it turns out ... Thanks for the quick responses ... -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:05 PM > To: David Esposito > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Core dump on PG 7.1.3 > > > "David Esposito" <dvesposito@newnetco.com> writes: > > (gdb) p *variable > > $2 = {type = T_Var, varno = 65001, varattno = 3, vartype = 23, vartypmod > > = -1, varlevelsup = 0, varnoold = 2, varoattno = 11} > > (gdb) p *econtext > > $3 = {type = T_ExprContext, ecxt_scantuple = 0x82374c0, > ecxt_innertuple = > > 0x0, ecxt_outertuple = 0x0, > > ecxt_per_query_memory = 0x81dc7f8, ecxt_per_tuple_memory = 0x822f030, > > ecxt_param_exec_vals = 0x0, ecxt_param_list_info = 0x0, > > ecxt_aggvalues = 0x0, ecxt_aggnulls = 0x0} > > Hmm ... trying to access an "OUTER" variable in a context that has no > outer tuple ... and it's called from EvalPlanQual ... yes, this is a > known bug. I believe it's the same case addressed by this recent fix: > > 2002-02-11 15:10 tgl > > * src/backend/executor/: nodeIndexscan.c, nodeTidscan.c: Repair > problems with EvalPlanQual where target table is scanned as inner > indexscan (ie, one with runtime keys). ExecIndexReScan must > compute or recompute runtime keys even if we are rescanning in the > EPQ case. TidScan seems to have comparable problems. Per bug > noted by Barry Lind 11-Feb-02. > > The EvalPlanQual path is only taken in concurrent-update scenarios; > probably the reason you could not reproduce the problem on your devel > box is that you executed the query in isolation, not in competition > with other updates on the same rows. > > This fix is in 7.2.1 --- it is *not* in 7.2. If you can afford to > update your production box to 7.2.1 now, that's the approach I'd > recommend. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: