RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
От | shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OSZPR01MB63106EADF50E0E710D36CE5DFDCA9@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 6, 2022 4:56 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here are my review comments for v5-0002 (TAP tests) > > Your changes followed a similar pattern of refactoring so most of my > comments below is repeated for all the files. > Thanks for your comments. > ====== > > 1. Commit message > > For the tap tests about streaming option in logical replication, test both > 'on' and 'apply' option. > > SUGGESTION > Change all TAP tests using the PUBLICATION "streaming" option, so they > now test both 'on' and 'apply' values. > OK. But "streaming" is a subscription option, so I modified it to: Change all TAP tests using the SUBSCRIPTION "streaming" option, so they now test both 'on' and 'apply' values. > ~~~ > > 4. src/test/subscription/t/015_stream.pl > > +# Test streaming mode apply > +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM test_tab WHERE (a > 2)"); > $node_publisher->wait_for_catchup($appname); > > I think those 2 lines do not really belong after the "# Test streaming > mode apply" comment. IIUC they are really just doing cleanup from the > prior test part so I think they should > > a) be *above* this comment (and say "# cleanup the test data") or > b) maybe it is best to put all the cleanup lines actually inside the > 'test_streaming' function so that the last thing the function does is > clean up after itself. > > option b seems tidier to me. > I also think option b seems better, so I put them inside test_streaming(). The rest of the comments are fixed as suggested. Besides, I noticed that we didn't free the background worker after preparing a transaction in the main patch, so made some small changes to fix it. Attach the updated patches. Regards, Shi yu
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: