RE: Move the injection_points extension to contrib?
От | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Move the injection_points extension to contrib? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OSCPR01MB14966D3BACFD1B2FEF230FD2BF54FA@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Move the injection_points extension to contrib? (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Move the injection_points extension to contrib?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Antonin, > Having the extension in contrib would be useful in cases a 3rd party extension > uses injection points in its regression tests. In particular, it's more > practical for CI to install the "injection_points" extension by installing the > "contrib" binary package than by building the whole server from source. (AFAIK > the src/modules/injection_points directory is currently not included in any > package.) IIRC, one of the motivation why we put src/test/modules is to ensure the flexiblity. Even contrib modules must follow the rule [1]. E.g., ABI must be kept and API change should be considered carefully - commits like [2] may be restricted. Also We may even have to consider that whether the name of injection points should be kept or not. How do you feel? [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/xfunc-c.html#XFUNC-GUIDANCE-API-COMPATIBILITY [2]: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/f4af4515bb5f3591d49bc16b6cb8ddbf66f98374 Best regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: