RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
От | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OSBPR01MB4888EC3C4DC697B1FAE7226CED399@OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, June 3, 2021 1:09 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:18 AM osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com > <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Thank you for providing the patch. > > I have updated your patch to include some other viewpoints. > > > > I also included the description about TRUNCATE on user_catalog_table > > in the patch. Please have a look at this patch. > > 1) I was not able to generate html docs with the attached patch: > logicaldecoding.sgml:1128: element sect1: validity error : Element... Thank you for your review. I fixed the patch to make it pass to generate html output. Kindly have a look at the v03. > 2) You could change hang to deadlock: > + logical decoding of published table within the same > transaction leads to a hang. Yes. I included your point. Thanks. Best Regards, Takamichi Osumi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: