RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

On Sunday, June 20, 2021 9:50 PM I wrote:
> On Sunday, June 20, 2021 3:23 PM  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 9:28 AM osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
> > <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > * doc/src/sgml/logicaldecoding.sgml
> ...
> > >
> > > Now we have the four paren supplementary descriptions, not to make
> > > users miss any other [user] catalog tables.
> > > Because of this, the built output html gives me some redundant
> > > impression, for that parts. Accordingly, couldn't we move them to
> > > outside of the itemizedlist section in a simple manner ?
> > >
> > > For example, to insert a sentence below the list, after removing the
> > > paren descriptions in the listitem, which says "Note that those
> > > commands that can cause deadlock apply to not only explicitly
> > > indicated system catalog tables above but also any other [user] catalog
> table."
> >
> > Sounds reasonable to me. /but also any other/but also to any other/,
> > to seems to be missing in the above line. Kindly send an update patch.
> Excuse me, I don't understand the second sentence.
> I wrote "but also" clause in my example.
> 
> Also, attached the patch for the change to the HEAD.
I've updated the patch to follow the correction Amit-san mentioned.
Please check.

Best Regards,
    Takamichi Osumi