RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

On Monday, June 7, 2021 6:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:44 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > One more comment is that for HEAD, first just create a patch with
> > synchronous replication-related doc changes and then write a separate
> > patch for prepared transactions.
> >
> 
> I noticed that docs for "Synchronous replication support for Logical Decoding"
> has been introduced by commit
> 49c0864d7ef5227faa24f903902db90e5c9d5d69 which goes till 9.6. So, I think
> you need to create a patch for 9.6 as well unless one of the existing patches
> already applies in 9.6.
OK. I could apply PG10's patch to 9.6.
Also, I've made a separate patch for 2PC description.

On the other hand, I need to mention that
there are some gaps to cause failures to apply patches
between supported versions.
(e.g. applying a patch for HEAD to stable PG13 fails)

To address the gaps between the versions,
I needed to conduct some manual fixes.
Therefore, please note that the content of patch
between PG12 and PG13 are almost same
like PG9.6 and PG10, but, I prepared
independent patches for HEAD and PG11,
in order to make those applied in a comfortable manner.


Kindly have a look at the updated patch-set.
They all passed the test of make html.

Best Regards,
    Takamichi Osumi