Hello Tom,
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I think it depends how exactly it's implemented. As Tom pointed out in
> > his message [1], we can't do the erasure itself in the post-commit is
> > not being able to handle errors. But if the files are renamed durably,
> > and the erasure happens in a separate process, that could be OK. The
> > COMMIT may wayt for it or not, that's mostly irrelevant I think.
>
> How is requiring a file rename to be completed post-commit any less
> problematic than the other way? You still have a non-negligible
> chance of failure.
I think that errors of rename(2) listed in [1] cannot occur or can be handled.
What do you think?
[1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/rename.2.html
Regards,
--
Takanori Asaba