RE: Terminate the idle sessions
От | kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Terminate the idle sessions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OSBPR01MB31578B0404627324A0F74158F5E30@OSBPR01MB3157.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Terminate the idle sessions (Li Japin <japinli@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Terminate the idle sessions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Li, > Thanks for your advice! Attached v4. I confirmed it. OK. > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ typedef enum TimeoutId > STANDBY_DEADLOCK_TIMEOUT, > STANDBY_TIMEOUT, > STANDBY_LOCK_TIMEOUT, > + IDLE_SESSION_TIMEOUT, > IDLE_IN_TRANSACTION_SESSION_TIMEOUT, > /* First user-definable timeout reason */ > USER_TIMEOUT, I'm not familiar with timeout, but I can see that the priority of idle-session is set lower than transaction-timeout. Could you explain the reason? In my image this timeout locates at the lowest layer, so it might have the lowest priority. Other codes are still checked :-(. Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: