RE: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq
От | nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OSAPR01MB39403A338E95D4709EF3028096E20@OSAPR01MB3940.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Michael-san. > From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:13:36AM +0000, nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com wrote: > > I don't think that the rest one of my proposals has been rejected > > completely, so I want to restart discussion. > I recall on the matter that there was consensus that nobody really liked this option > because it enforced a cancellation on the connection. It seems that you did not think so at that time. # Please refer to [1] I don't think all the reviewers are completely negative. I think some couldn't judge because lack of what kind of problem I was going to solve and the way to solve it, so I restartedto describe them in this time. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190406065428.GA2145%40paquier.xyz Best regards, --------------------- Ryohei Nagaura
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: