RE: WIP: Aggregation push-down - take2
От | Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" |
---|---|
Тема | RE: WIP: Aggregation push-down - take2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS3PR01MB666003EBE5B7234FDFB9018E95869@OS3PR01MB6660.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | WIP: Aggregation push-down - take2 ("Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" <Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down - take2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi everyone. I rebased the following patches which were submitted in [1]. v17-0001-Introduce-RelInfoList-structure.patch v17-0002-Aggregate-push-down-basic-functionality.patch v17-0003-Use-also-partial-paths-as-the-input-for-grouped-path.patch I checked I can apply the rebased patch to commit 2cd2569c72b8920048e35c31c9be30a6170e1410. I'm going to register the rebased patch in next commitfest. Sincerely yours, Yuuki Fujii [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/ -- Yuuki Fujii Information Technology R&D Center Mitsubishi Electric Corporation > -----Original Message----- > From: Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp > <Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp> > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2022 4:33 PM > To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org > Cc: david@pgmasters.net; ah@cybertec.at; tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us; Tomas Vondra > <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>; zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com; > legrand_legrand@hotmail.com; daniel@yesql.se > Subject: [CAUTION!! MELCO?] WIP: Aggregation push-down - take2 > > Hi everyone. > > I develop postgresql's extension such as fdw in my work. > I'm interested in using postgresql for OLAP. > After [1] having been withdrawn, I reviewed [1]. > I think that this patch is realy useful when using OLAP queries. > Furthermore, I think it would be more useful if this patch works on a foreign > table. > So, I would like to ask you a question on this patch in this new thread. > > I changed this patch a little and confirmed that my idea is true. > The followings are things I found and differences of between my prototype and > this patch. > 1. Things I found > I execute a query which contain join of postgres_fdw's foreign table and a > table and aggregation of the join result. > In my setting, my prototype reduce this query's response by 93%. > 2. Differences between my prototype and this patch > (1) Pushdown aggregation of foeign table if FDW pushdown partial > aggregation > (2) postgres_fdw pushdowns some partial aggregations I attached my > prototype source code and content of my experiment. > I want to resume development of this patch if there is some possibility of > accept of this patch's function. > I took a contact to Mr.Houska on resuming development of this patch. > As a result, Mr.Houska advised for me that I ask in pgsql-hackers whether any > reviewers / committers are interested to work on the patch. > Is anyone interested in my work? > > Sincerely yours. > Yuuki Fujii > > [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/ > > -- > Yuuki Fujii > Information Technology R&D Center Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: