RE: Confused comment about drop replica identity index
От | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Confused comment about drop replica identity index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS3PR01MB6275A10D03572E27C4E2C9769E769@OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:25AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Yeah, the comment is wrong. If the index of a REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX is > dropped, I recall that the behavior is the same as REPLICA_IDENTITY_NOTHING. Thank you for your response. I agreed that the comment is wrong. > Not sure about the DROP INDEX page, but I'd be fine with mentioning that in the > ALTER TABLE page in the paragraph related to REPLICA IDENTITY. While on it, I > would be tempted to switch this stuff to use a list of <variablelist> for all the option > values. That would be much easier to read. Yeah, if we can add some details to pg-doc and code comments, I think it will be more friendly to PG users and developers. Regards, Wang wei
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: