RE: pg_type_d.h location incorrect
От | tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: pg_type_d.h location incorrect |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB61131DD84072DC0DC5E3E003FB249@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_type_d.h location incorrect (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_type_d.h location incorrect
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Wednesday, May 26, 2021 12:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote >In the first place, it's somewhere between unhelpful and flat out wrong for >people on Windows, where the backtick notation doesn't work (AFAIK). >In the second, it will distract almost every user, who will need >to stop for a second or two to think about what context they would >use backticks in, and about what pg_config is, and whether the right >pg_config is even in their $PATH, and about why --pkgincludedir is >the right switch. If they don't already have a bunch of those facts >swapped in, it will take a lot longer than a second or two to figure >out what is meant here. That seems completely out of proportion to >the value of having this passing mention be pedantically correct. Thanks for your comments. You're right, backtick notation doesn't work at my windows machine. But I made the fix in accordance with the pg-doc as below. So maybe we need a fix there, too? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-pgservice.html a system-wide file at `pg_config --sysconfdir`/pg_service.conf Regards, Tang
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: