RE: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
От | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB5716F30A47440254F8E5507194269@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 3:58 PM > > From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki <mailto:tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com> > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 3:34 PM > > > > From: mailto:houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <mailto:houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> > > > I think this patch can solve the performance degradation of key > > > expression after applying the [Save the last partition] patch. > > > Besides, this could be a separate patch which can improve some more > cases. > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Thank you for proposing an impressive improvement so quickly! Yes, > > I'm in the mood for adopting Amit-san's patch as a base because it's > > compact and readable, and plus add this patch of yours to complement > > the partition key function case. > > Thanks for looking into this. > > > But ... > > > > * Applying your patch alone produced a compilation error. I'm sorry I > > mistakenly deleted the compile log, but it said something like > > "There's a redeclaration of PartKeyContext in partcache.h; the > > original definition is in partdef.h" > > It seems a little strange, I have compiled it alone in two different linux machine > and did not find such an error. Did you compile it on a windows machine ? Ah, Maybe I found the issue. Attaching a new patch, please have a try on this patch. Best regards, houzj
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: