RE: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid
От | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB5716DD832E8B50891204E9A594629@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 4:48 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:55 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 2:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:19 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > As in, > > > > do we know of any replication (initial/streaming) misbehavior > > > > caused by the duplicate partition OIDs in this case or is the only > > > > problem that pg_publication_tables output looks odd? > > > > > > The latter one but I think either we should document this or change > > > it as we can't assume users will follow what subscriber-side code does. > > > > On second thought, I agree that de-duplicating partitions from this > > view is an improvement. > > > > Fair enough. Hou-San, Can you please submit the updated patch after fixing > any pending comments including the test case? OK, I will submit the updated patch soon. Best regards, Hou zj
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: