RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
От | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB5716D4EECE46ABC4B0370AEA94EFA@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node ("Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 11:18 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 3:35 PM Kuroda, Hayato/黒田 隼人 > <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > 4. > + * XXX: As mentioned in comments atop get_output_plugins(), we may > not > + * have to consider the uniqueness of entries. If so, we can use > + * count_old_cluster_logical_slots() instead of plugin_list_length(). > + */ > > I think check_loadable_libraries() will avoid loading the same library, so it seems > fine to skip duplicating the plugins and we can save some codes. Sorry, there is a typo, I mean "deduplicating" instead of " duplicating " > > ---- > /* Did the library name change? Probe it. */ > if (libnum == 0 || strcmp(lib, os_info.libraries[libnum - > 1].name) != 0) > ---- > > But if we think duplicating them would be better, I feel we could use the Here also " duplicating " should be "deduplicating". Best Regards, Hou zj
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: