RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
Тема RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Дата
Msg-id OS0PR01MB5716D3E6885195C1FFC4C56E94072@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thursday, April 4, 2024 4:25 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:13 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:36 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> > > <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I quickly looked at v8, and have a nit, rest all looks good.
> > > >
> > > > +        if (DecodingContextReady(ctx) &&
> found_consistent_snapshot)
> > > > +            *found_consistent_snapshot = true;
> > > >
> > > > Can the found_consistent_snapshot be checked first to help avoid
> > > > the function call DecodingContextReady() for
> > > > pg_replication_slot_advance callers?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Okay, changed. Additionally, I have updated the comments and commit
> > > message. I'll push this patch after some more testing.
> > >
> >
> > Pushed!
> 
> While testing this change, I realized that it could happen that the server logs
> are flooded with the following logical decoding logs that are written every 200
> ms:

Thanks for reporting!

> 
> 2024-04-04 16:15:19.270 JST [3838739] LOG:  starting logical decoding for slot
> "test_sub"
> 2024-04-04 16:15:19.270 JST [3838739] DETAIL:  Streaming transactions
> committing after 0/50006F48, reading WAL from 0/50006F10.
> 2024-04-04 16:15:19.270 JST [3838739] LOG:  logical decoding found
> consistent point at 0/50006F10
> 2024-04-04 16:15:19.270 JST [3838739] DETAIL:  There are no running
> transactions.
> 2024-04-04 16:15:19.477 JST [3838739] LOG:  starting logical decoding for slot
> "test_sub"
> 2024-04-04 16:15:19.477 JST [3838739] DETAIL:  Streaming transactions
> committing after 0/50006F48, reading WAL from 0/50006F10.
> 2024-04-04 16:15:19.477 JST [3838739] LOG:  logical decoding found
> consistent point at 0/50006F10
> 2024-04-04 16:15:19.477 JST [3838739] DETAIL:  There are no running
> transactions.
> 
> For example, I could reproduce it with the following steps:
> 
> 1. create the primary and start.
> 2. run "pgbench -i -s 100" on the primary.
> 3. run pg_basebackup to create the standby.
> 4. configure slotsync setup on the standby and start.
> 5. create a publication for all tables on the primary.
> 6. create the subscriber and start.
> 7. run "pgbench -i -Idtpf" on the subscriber.
> 8. create a subscription on the subscriber (initial data copy will start).
> 
> The logical decoding logs were written every 200 ms during the initial data
> synchronization.
> 
> Looking at the new changes for update_local_synced_slot():
...
> We call LogicalSlotAdvanceAndCheckSnapState() if one of confirmed_lsn,
> restart_lsn, and catalog_xmin is different between the remote slot and the local
> slot. In my test case, during the initial sync performing, only catalog_xmin was
> different and there was no serialized snapshot at restart_lsn, and the slotsync
> worker called LogicalSlotAdvanceAndCheckSnapState(). However no slot
> properties were changed even after the function and it set slot_updated = true.
> So it starts the next slot synchronization after 200ms.

I was trying to reproduce this and check why the catalog_xmin is different
among synced slot and remote slot, but I was not able to reproduce the case
where there are lots of logical decoding logs. The script I used is attached.

Would it be possible for you to share the script you used to reproduce this
issue? Alternatively, could you please share the log files from both the
primary and standby servers after reproducing the problem (it would be greatly
helpful if you could set the log level to DEBUG2).

Best Regards,
Hou zj

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: post-freeze damage control
Следующее
От: Andrei Lepikhov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: post-freeze damage control