RE: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication
От | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB5716BC64682DEE780536739394D39@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:54 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v3 patch has the changes for the > > same. > > > > I think this bug should be fixed in back branches (till v10). OTOH, as this is not > reported by any user and we have found it during code review so it seems > either users don't have an exact use case or they haven't noticed this yet. What > do you people think about back-patching? Personally, I think it's ok to back-patch. > Attached, please find a slightly updated patch with minor changes. I have > slightly changed the test to make it more meaningful. The patch looks good to me. Best regards, Hou zj
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: