RE: Added schema level support for publication.
От | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Added schema level support for publication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB57165E1B7D5A5241654C696894D29@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Added schema level support for publication. (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Added schema level support for publication.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From Thur, Sep 2, 2021 2:33 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 6:58 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > Here are some other comments for v23-000x patches. > > 3) > > > > + .description = > "PUBLICATION SCHEMA", > > + .section = > SECTION_POST_DATA, > > + .createStmt > > + = query->data)); > > > > Is it better to use something like 'PUBLICATION TABLES IN SCHEMA' to > > describe the schema level table publication ? Because there could be > > some other type publication such as 'ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA' in the > > future, it will be better to make it clear that we only publish table in schema in > this patch. > > Modified Thanks for updating the patch. I think we might also need to mention the publication object 'table' in the following types: 1) + /* OCLASS_PUBLICATION_SCHEMA */ + { + "publication schema", OBJECT_PUBLICATION_SCHEMA + }, 2) + PUBLICATIONOBJ_SCHEMA, /* Schema type */ + PUBLICATIONOBJ_UNKNOWN /* Unknown type */ +} PublicationObjSpecType; 3) + DO_PUBLICATION_SCHEMA, I think it might be to change the typename like XX_REL_IN_SCHEMA, and adjust the comments. Best regards, Hou zj
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: