RE: row filtering for logical replication
От | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: row filtering for logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB57164EC0E50AA7778861552D94299@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: row filtering for logical replication ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: row filtering for logical replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, February 3, 2022 11:11 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> > On Tuesday, February 1, 2022 7:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:15 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com > > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, January 31, 2022 9:02 PM Amit Kapila > > > <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Review Comments: > > =============== > > 1. > > + else if (IsA(node, OpExpr)) > > + { > > + /* OK, except user-defined operators are not allowed. */ if > > + (((OpExpr > > + *) node)->opno >= FirstNormalObjectId) errdetail_msg = > > + _("User-defined operators are not allowed."); } > > > > Is it sufficient to check only the allowed operators for OpExpr? Don't > > we need to check opfuncid to ensure that the corresponding function is > > immutable? Also, what about opresulttype, opcollid, and inputcollid? I > > think we don't want to allow user-defined types or collations but as > > we are restricting the opexp to use a built-in operator, those should > > not be present in such an expression. If that is the case, then I think we can > add a comment for the same. > > > > 2. Can we handle RelabelType node in > > check_simple_rowfilter_expr_walker()? I think you need to check > > resulttype and collation id to ensure that they are not user-defined. > > There doesn't seem to be a need to check resulttypmod as that refers > > to pg_attribute.atttypmod and that can't have anything unsafe. This > > helps us to handle cases like the following which currently gives an > > error: > > create table t1(c1 int, c2 varchar(100)); create publication pub1 for > > table t1 where > > (c2 < 'john'); > > > > 3. Similar to above, don't we need to consider disallowing > > non-built-in collation of Var type nodes? Now, as we are only > > supporting built-in types this might not be required. So, probably a > comment would suffice. > > I adjusted the code in check_simple_rowfilter_expr_walker to handle the > collation/type/function. > > > 4. > > A minor nitpick in tab-complete: > > postgres=# Alter PUBLICATION pub1 ADD TABLE t2 WHERE ( c2 > 10) > > , WHERE ( > > > > After the Where clause, it should not allow adding WHERE. This doesn't > > happen for CREATE PUBLICATION case. > > I will look into this and change it soon. Since the v76-0000-clean-up-pgoutput-cache-invalidation.patch has been committed, attach a new version patch set to make the cfbot happy. Also addressed the above comments related to tab-complete in 0002 patch. Best regards, Hou zj
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: