RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
От | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB571603F90202D6709B5DF5B594689@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 1:23 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 1:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 9:12 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If so, the result from the second check_sql is unstable and it's > > > probably better to check the result only once. That is, the first > > > check_sql includes the command and we exit from the function once we > > > confirm the error entry is expectedly updated. > > > > > > > Yeah, I think that should be fine. > > Okay, I've attached an updated patch. Please review it. > I agreed that checking the result only once makes the test more stable. The patch looks good to me. Best regards, Hou zj
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: