RE: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
От | r.takahashi_2@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB5682B499319EBEB59F416AD582619@OS0PR01MB5682.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance (Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Nagata-san, > Ok. I'll fix _copyIntoClause() and _equalIntoClause() as well as _readIntoClause() > and _outIntoClause(). OK. > > ivm=# create table t (c1 int, c2 int); > > CREATE TABLE > > ivm=# create incremental materialized view ivm_t as select distinct c1 from t; > > NOTICE: created index "ivm_t_index" on materialized view "ivm_t" > > SELECT 0 > > > > Then I executed pg_dump. > > > > In the dump, the following SQLs appear. > > > > CREATE INCREMENTAL MATERIALIZED VIEW public.ivm_t AS > > SELECT DISTINCT t.c1 > > FROM public.t > > WITH NO DATA; > > > > ALTER TABLE ONLY public.ivm_t > > ADD CONSTRAINT ivm_t_index UNIQUE (c1); > > > > If I execute psql with the result of pg_dump, following error occurs. > > > > ERROR: ALTER action ADD CONSTRAINT cannot be performed on relation > "ivm_t" > > DETAIL: This operation is not supported for materialized views. > > Good catch! It was my mistake creating unique constraints on IMMV in spite of > we cannot defined them via SQL. I'll fix it to use unique indexes instead of > constraints. I checked the same procedure on v24 patch. But following error occurs instead of the original error. ERROR: relation "ivm_t_index" already exists Regards, Ryohei Takahashi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: