Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
От | Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Low Performance for big hospital server .. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OFFAF4E49E.8472B1FE-ON05256F81.006575F6@ftw.us.ray.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Low Performance for big hospital server .. (amrit@health2.moph.go.th) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
In my younger days I denormalized a database for performance reasons and have been paid for it dearly with increased maintenance costs. Adding enhanced capabilities and new functionality will render denormalization worse than useless quickly. --Rick Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org> To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> Sent by: cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org pgsql-performance-owner@pos Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Low Performance for big hospital server.. tgresql.org 01/06/2005 12:12 PM On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:06:55 -0800 Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > I can't tell you how many times I've seen this sort of thing. And > the developers always tell me "Well, we denormalized for performance > reasons ... " Now that's rich. I don't think I've ever seen a database perform worse after it was normalized. In fact, I can't even think of a situation where it could! --------------------------------- Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org> http://www.wiles.org --------------------------------- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: