Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
От | Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OFB365FC7A.33C8C3E0-ON05256F86.0051ABB9@ftw.us.ray.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft (Randolf Richardson <rr@8x.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim wrote: you'd be hard-pressed to find too many real-world examples where you could do something with a PostgreSQL procedural language that you couldn't do with PL/SQL. Rick mumbled: You can't get it for nothing! %) "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> To: alex@neteconomist.com Sent by: cc: Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>, Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de>, pgsql-performance-owner@pos gpd@gpdnet.co.uk, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org tgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft 01/10/2005 06:29 PM On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:46:01PM -0500, Alex Turner wrote: > You sir are correct! You can't use perl in MS-SQL or Oracle ;). On the other hand, PL/SQL is incredibly powerful, especially combined with all the tools/utilities that come with Oracle. I think you'd be hard-pressed to find too many real-world examples where you could do something with a PostgreSQL procedural language that you couldn't do with PL/SQL. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: