Re: PostgreSQL without cygwin.
От | Steve_Miller@sil.org |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL without cygwin. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OF6164960E.879BFC3B-ON86256CCD.00765E52@sil.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL without cygwin. (Ben Clewett <B.Clewett@roadrunner.uk.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL without cygwin.
|
Список | pgsql-cygwin |
Todd, I for one wouldn't mind seeing it. But I can't get to the site you listed below. Steve Miller SIL International On 02/14/2003 03:17:37 PM pgsql-cygwin-owner wrote: >i have assembled the minimum components and an install script for >postgres on windows. see > >http://genex.ncgr.org/downloads/genex-lite > >specifically, cygmin.tgz (minimum cygwin for postgres) includes the >necessary components to get postgres working on windows. note that the >windows registry must be modified for the whole thing to work. the >included install.bat does the needed mods to the registry (as i recall). > >Todd Peterson >Sr. Developer >The National Center for Genome Resources >Santa Fe, New Mexico USA > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Ben Clewett wrote: > >> Stand alone PostgrSQL. >> >> How hard would it be to make PostgreSQL stand-alone without cgywin? And >> if not, if there a sort of minumim configuration of .dll's which could >> be used to build, say, an InstallShield which got the product up and >> running? >> >> As well, if anybody knows, how the development of the stand-alone NT >> version of PostgreSQL is progressing? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html >> > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > >http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: