Re: Interpreting vmstat
От | Thom Dyson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interpreting vmstat |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OF548594A5.D2D24DD0-ON88256E9A.00575B92-88256E9A.0057ED01@sybex.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Interpreting vmstat (Doug Y <dylists@ptd.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Well, Since I haven't seen any other responds, I'll offer a bit of advice and let others correct me. :) Your shared buffers may be too big (?). It is much larger than the guide on varlena.com recommends. All I can suggest is trying some experiments with halving/doubling the numbers to see which way performance goes. Also, if you are counting on cache to improve performance, then the db has to be loaded into cache the first time. So, are subsequent re-queries faster? Thom Dyson Director of Information Services Sybex, Inc. pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org wrote on 05/18/2004 11:12:14 AM: > Hello, > (note best viewed in fixed-width font) > > I'm still trying to find where my performance bottle neck is... > I have 4G ram, PG 7.3.4 > shared_buffers = 75000 > effective_cache_size = 75000
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: