Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?

Unsubscribe me. Or Can anyone forward me the emailId of the concerned
person..??

Regards,
Anjali Sinha
ASCG, Reliance Infocomm
J Block, SB-11, 2nd Floor,
Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City,
Thane Belapur Road, New Mumbai India, 400 709
DID: 91 22 30387862
____________________________________________

                                                                                           Alvaro Herrera
                                        <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.or        To:       Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
         g>                             cc:       Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, Robert Treat
Sent by:                        <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, (bcc: Anjali
      pgsql-hackers-owner@pos         Sinha/INFOCOMM/RIL)                     tgresql.org                    Subject:
Re:[HACKERS] Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?                                              Importance: Normal
Sender'sOU: Reliance |------------------|
        | [ ] Confidential |                     10/07/2005 09:38 PM
|------------------|
                                       




On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> > No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
> > they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a
hack.
>
> Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
> both
>
>            int pg_cancel_backend(int)
>            bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
>
> with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?

+1

--
Alvaro Herrera
http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca"
(Orual)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings