Re: pl/pgsql oddity
От | Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pl/pgsql oddity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OF0EDB0829.037C6E3B-ON05256F6C.0070A6BE@ftw.us.ray.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pl/pgsql oddity ("Joolz" <joolz@arbodienst-limburg.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: pl/pgsql oddity
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I prefer the FORTRAN66 construct IF <condition> <label1> <label2> <label3> where it jumps to label1 if <condition> is negative, label2 if zero, and label3 if positive. No else ifs about it. I hope you realize I'm as kidding as I am obviously too old. Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> To: Geoffrey <esoteric@3times25.net> Sent by: cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org pgsql-general-owner@pos Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pl/pgsql oddity tgresql.org 12/16/2004 01:16 PM On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote: > I don't know of any other language that permits multiple spellings for > the same construct. I'd be concerned with starting such a precedent. I'd be in favor of making it a bloody law that every bloody language use the same bloody spelling. I'm forever forgetting whether a particular language uses ELSE IF, ELSEIF, ELSIF, or ELIF. Grumble, grumble, grumble.... -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: