Re: infinity as a date
От | Peter Darley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: infinity as a date |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NNEAICKPNOGDBHNCEDCPEEDNDDAA.pdarley@kinesis-cem.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: infinity as a date (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom and Everyone, Not that I feel that I get a vote, but it seems to me that an infinite date doesn't make any sense. An interval is a measure of something (a value), which could be infinite, but a date is a point in time (not a value), similar to a location, and I don't think that the concept of an infinite point in time makes any more sense than an infinite street address. Just my $0.02. Thanks, Peter Darley -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:35 PM To: Jean-Christian Imbeault Cc: pgsql-general Subject: Re: [GENERAL] infinity as a date Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc@mega-bucks.co.jp> writes: > As an aside, why is there a concept of an infinite timestamp but not one > for date? Purely historical, I'd imagine. The various Postgres datatypes were developed at different times by different people. Tom Lockhart perhaps remembers more about this particular discrepancy. If you are sufficiently annoyed, please submit patches to make DATE treat MAXINT and MININT as +infinity and -infinity instead of normal dates. I would expect we'd accept such a patch. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: