Re: Selecting random row
От | Michal Taborsky |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Selecting random row |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NMEMKDFAHDFEAMGBCDKFIEPNCFAA.michal@taborsky.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Selecting random row (Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Weeeell, we are getting close to something, that might work :) But the problem with this solution is, that OFFSET refuses to take anything but constant number (ie. 10). This might be overcome by first getting the count in one query, then compute the random offest and build a new query with this number as an OFFSET argument. It will probably be faster, but it is not too clean - i would have to use some outside scripting or create a pl/pgSQL function for that. I have access to only 7.1.3 version at the moment, maybe 7.2 can handle this like you wrote ? Michal -----Original Message----- From: Doug McNaught [mailto:doug@wireboard.com] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 6:20 PM To: Michal Taborsky Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Selecting random row "Michal Taborsky" <michal@taborsky.cz> writes: > This does decrease the the cost, but only very little (10500 -> 9800), which > is not the solution. That thing with sequential index might work for some > cases, that is true. Unfortunately not in this one, because I actually do > not select random row from a table, but from a complex select query > resultset. But thanks for the suggestions. Why not SELECT * FROM table LIMIT 1 OFFSET random(SELECT count(*) FROM TABLE); I don't know if this is the exact syntax but you get the idea... -Doug
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: