RE: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . .
От | Andrew Snow |
---|---|
Тема | RE: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . . |
Дата | |
Msg-id | NHEALMDKDACEIPBNOOOCEEKICCAA.als@fl.net.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | unique row identifier data type exhausted . . . (Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . .
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> It feels like there should be some *really* obvious answer to this > question, and I'll find myself whacking my forehead in self-abasement > and out of sheer relief to have found the answer to a problem that > should not have bothered me in the first place since the answer is too > self-evident . . . however, it is bothering me: what happens if the data > type that you've chosen to uniquely identify a row is exhausted? If, for > instance you use int4 and you've had your couple billion deletes and > inserts on the table and the next nextval('seq') . . . well, what > exactly happens and how do they do it? Admittedly, 10^9 is a big number > but it is far from out of the question that you'd reach it on a really > busy database (can't think of a real-world example but that ought to be > a moot point), not to mention oids since they are unique across an > entire database. I am curious to know how difficult it would be (if at all) to change the type that oid represents, to a 64 bit number. C'mon guys, this isn't the 90s any more! - Andrew
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: